Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Grass
Weekend Appointments Available
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profile
  • Criminal Defense
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Video Center
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profile
  • Criminal Defense
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Video Center
  • Contact Us
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu

The legality of using drug sniffing dogs during traffic stops

Blog 2015 October The legality of using drug sniffing dogs during traffic stops
Previous Post  |  Next Post

The legality of using drug sniffing dogs during traffic stops

Posted By Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Grass || 15-Oct-2015

Ask anyone in Dallas if law enforcement needs to first have a warrant in order to use dogs to try and detect the presence of drugs in a home, and he or she would likely answer yes. He or she would be right, too. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that any investigation of a home and its surroundings meets the definition of a search, and therefore requires a warrant. Yet what if an officer wants to use a dog to search a car for drugs?

The Supreme Court has determined that drivers do not have the expectation of privacy in issues regarding the smelling of their cars. Thus, an officer searching through a car with a drug-sniffing dog does not legally constitute a search, so no warrant is needed.

However, a recent decision by the Supreme Court determined that without probable cause, law enforcement officials cannot prolong a traffic stop in order to conduct a dog sniff search. Even if officers believe they have probable cause due to the reaction of the dog prior to the search, the validity of such a claim can still come into question. In a U.S. Circuit Court ruling, whose results were shared by the American Society of Canine Trainers, it was established that a drug sniffing dog must officially alert to the potential presence of drugs in order to establish probable cause. Simply showing interest in or casting towards a vehicle is not enough.

Even in situations where the dog does alert, one may still be able to call into question the reliability of such a response as evidence. Further information shared by the ASCT shows that courts have recognized the accuracy of drug dog alerts to be as low as 62 percent.

Do Not Wait to Secure Tough Defense

To get started on your defense right away, call our firm at or fill out the form below.

  • State Bar of Texas
  • Top Lawyer Lifetime Member
  • BBB
  • 10 Best American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
  • National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers
Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Grass

Please take a moment to review your experience with us. Your feedback not only helps us, it helps other potential clients.

I had a positive experience.
I had a negative experience.

Please take a moment to share your experience with us on one of these review sites.

Citysearch Facebook

We strive for 100% customer satisfaction. If we fell short, please tell us how so we can make amends.

Send Message
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Plano Office


Plano, TX View Map
Main
Dallas Office
Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Grass
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

texas-defense-lawyer.com - © 2016 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts