Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Grass
Weekend Appointments Available
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profile
  • Criminal Defense
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Video Center
  • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Firm Overview
  • Attorney Profile
  • Criminal Defense
  • Testimonials
  • Blog
  • Video Center
  • Contact Us
  • Email Us
  • Our Map
  • Menu

Online solicitation of a minor laws found to infringe

Blog 2015 April Online solicitation of a minor laws found to infringe
Previous Post  |  Next Post

Online solicitation of a minor laws found to infringe

Posted By Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Grass || 15-Apr-2015

While Texas state and federal criminal law statutes are largely intended to account for the rights of claimants, they are also required to uphold the constitutional rights of defendants as well. As a result, the legality of any guideline can be challenged for infringing upon the rights of civilians accused of committing criminal offenses. The online solicitation of a minor section of Chapter 33 of the Texas Penal Code was recently reconsidered by the state's highest criminal court and found to be unconstitutional, illustrating the complexities of defending sex crime cases.

According to the section of the state's Penal Code, anyone over the age of 17 who uses electronic platforms to communicate in a sexually explicit manner with a minor with the intent of arousing or gratifying sexual desire can be accused of online solicitation. Under the statute, online solicitation of a minor can include but is not limited to the distribution of sexually explicit material and/or sexually explicit communications.

Considering the language and scope of the statute, serious questions and concerns have been raised over the types of interactions and materials that can be considered sexually explicit. It-lex.org discusses the decision issued by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that the specific section of the state Penal Code is unconstitutional, and explains that the language of the section is too broad reaching and vague.

Given that the terms of the statute define "sexually explicit" as any material, language or communication that describes or relates to sexual conduct, the court ruled that the statute failed to narrowly serve the law or protect free speech. After all, it was noted that everything from popular television to literature to music to be considered sexually explicit under the language of the statute, and could potentially result in claims over the online solicitation of a minor.

Do Not Wait to Secure Tough Defense

To get started on your defense right away, call our firm at or fill out the form below.

  • State Bar of Texas
  • Top Lawyer Lifetime Member
  • BBB
  • 10 Best American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
  • National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers
Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Grass

Please take a moment to review your experience with us. Your feedback not only helps us, it helps other potential clients.

I had a positive experience.
I had a negative experience.

Please take a moment to share your experience with us on one of these review sites.

Citysearch Facebook

We strive for 100% customer satisfaction. If we fell short, please tell us how so we can make amends.

Send Message
  • Home
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

Plano Office


Plano, TX View Map
Main
Dallas Office
Law Offices of Jeffrey C. Grass
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

texas-defense-lawyer.com - © 2016 All Rights Reserved.
Internet Marketing Experts